<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source is Free like a Free Puppy is Free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://interwovenblog.com/2008/11/19/open-source-is-free-like-a-free-puppy-is-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://interwovenblog.com/2008/11/19/open-source-is-free-like-a-free-puppy-is-free/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:39:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://interwovenblog.com/2008/11/19/open-source-is-free-like-a-free-puppy-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interwovenblog.com/?p=450#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Yes, these are some of my enterprise requirements:

1) cross-sell and retain their customers
2) quickly rollout landing pages for marketing campaigns 
3) increase conversion rates through multivariable testing and targeting to anonymous site visitors

Let&#039;s add
4) multisite capability
5) subscription management
6) triggered alerts and notifications
7) dynamically configurable SEO (on-page and off-page factors)
8) ability for business users to do all of the above without IS intervention

I&#039;m not convinced that proprietary tools do this better than open source tools, or vice-versa.

What I&#039;d really like to see is business cases that show why proprietary tools (or open source tools) deliver this better/faster/cheaper in each of these cases.  Or how to judge what is right for you?

That part is a bit murky to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, these are some of my enterprise requirements:</p>
<p>1) cross-sell and retain their customers<br />
2) quickly rollout landing pages for marketing campaigns<br />
3) increase conversion rates through multivariable testing and targeting to anonymous site visitors</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s add<br />
4) multisite capability<br />
5) subscription management<br />
6) triggered alerts and notifications<br />
7) dynamically configurable SEO (on-page and off-page factors)<br />
 <img src='http://interwovenblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> ability for business users to do all of the above without IS intervention</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not convinced that proprietary tools do this better than open source tools, or vice-versa.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;d really like to see is business cases that show why proprietary tools (or open source tools) deliver this better/faster/cheaper in each of these cases.  Or how to judge what is right for you?</p>
<p>That part is a bit murky to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie Weinberger</title>
		<link>http://interwovenblog.com/2008/11/19/open-source-is-free-like-a-free-puppy-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie Weinberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interwovenblog.com/?p=450#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Great discussion guys and good feedback.  My intention with the puppy blog (as it has become known) was not to slam open source in anyway.  We actually use open source technology on our website and in our products.  My point was that WCM has evolved enormously and what was CMS 10 years ago, is now really Web Content Optimization and comparing that to open source is like comparing puppies and kittens (to continue the theme).   

All the open source developers who commented on this blog are absolutely correct that the Webmaster bottle neck problem, versioning, workflow, and templating can be addressed very well by open source.  However, WCM is no longer just for IT or just about managing content, it&#039;s about helping the business meet their top line revenue goals.  

For global 2000 enterprises, marketers and business folks are trying to figure out how they are going to increase their SEO, how they are going to cross-sell and retain their customers, how they are going to quickly rollout landing pages for marketing campaigns, and how they are going to increase conversion rates through multivariable testing and targeting to anonymous site visitors.  And IT is looking to respond to those requirements with enterprise scale offerings that can be molded to suit the specific requirements of the online marketer.  

Love that this topic is so popular, keep the comments coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great discussion guys and good feedback.  My intention with the puppy blog (as it has become known) was not to slam open source in anyway.  We actually use open source technology on our website and in our products.  My point was that WCM has evolved enormously and what was CMS 10 years ago, is now really Web Content Optimization and comparing that to open source is like comparing puppies and kittens (to continue the theme).   </p>
<p>All the open source developers who commented on this blog are absolutely correct that the Webmaster bottle neck problem, versioning, workflow, and templating can be addressed very well by open source.  However, WCM is no longer just for IT or just about managing content, it&#8217;s about helping the business meet their top line revenue goals.  </p>
<p>For global 2000 enterprises, marketers and business folks are trying to figure out how they are going to increase their SEO, how they are going to cross-sell and retain their customers, how they are going to quickly rollout landing pages for marketing campaigns, and how they are going to increase conversion rates through multivariable testing and targeting to anonymous site visitors.  And IT is looking to respond to those requirements with enterprise scale offerings that can be molded to suit the specific requirements of the online marketer.  </p>
<p>Love that this topic is so popular, keep the comments coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://interwovenblog.com/2008/11/19/open-source-is-free-like-a-free-puppy-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interwovenblog.com/?p=450#comment-87</guid>
		<description>As a digital agency I employ real developers. Thats why I love OS solutions. A bug in the software? Easy, get one of our devs to patch it and submit it back to the project. Makes our project better, and makes the OS project better too!

 Cant do that with proprietary software!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a digital agency I employ real developers. Thats why I love OS solutions. A bug in the software? Easy, get one of our devs to patch it and submit it back to the project. Makes our project better, and makes the OS project better too!</p>
<p> Cant do that with proprietary software!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talon</title>
		<link>http://interwovenblog.com/2008/11/19/open-source-is-free-like-a-free-puppy-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Talon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interwovenblog.com/?p=450#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Interesting, however I am not sure you made your point.  No matter &quot;which&quot; animal you get free or for fee you always have &quot;ongoing costs&quot;, but you do remove the initial costs.  I believe that is the appeal of the free approach, removing the initial costs (Software), Interwoven should consider having both maybe merging with the like of Alfresco

-Talon Wolfhound</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, however I am not sure you made your point.  No matter &#8220;which&#8221; animal you get free or for fee you always have &#8220;ongoing costs&#8221;, but you do remove the initial costs.  I believe that is the appeal of the free approach, removing the initial costs (Software), Interwoven should consider having both maybe merging with the like of Alfresco</p>
<p>-Talon Wolfhound</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serge</title>
		<link>http://interwovenblog.com/2008/11/19/open-source-is-free-like-a-free-puppy-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Serge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interwovenblog.com/?p=450#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Before taking a puppy you will look at it, and decide if you like this puppy or not and if you&#039;d like to take it with you or not.

The same way is with open source products. Before adopting it and decide if you would like to use it you will test it, play around and find if it suits you or not, if you ready to pay for additional features or not.

Won&#039;t you buy a sweet bone for your puppy? Will you leave it alone? If you really like it you will not do it. (the same with open source)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before taking a puppy you will look at it, and decide if you like this puppy or not and if you&#8217;d like to take it with you or not.</p>
<p>The same way is with open source products. Before adopting it and decide if you would like to use it you will test it, play around and find if it suits you or not, if you ready to pay for additional features or not.</p>
<p>Won&#8217;t you buy a sweet bone for your puppy? Will you leave it alone? If you really like it you will not do it. (the same with open source)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justen</title>
		<link>http://interwovenblog.com/2008/11/19/open-source-is-free-like-a-free-puppy-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Justen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interwovenblog.com/?p=450#comment-84</guid>
		<description>having a clear idea of what you want to achieve in terms of the requirements helps in deciding which solution will fit the bill, however in the real world this is never the case! 

choosing open source can give you free access to the code base (or for a very small fee) before you start coding - this can help in making a decision for the long term future of the application.

then there is the case of hiring developers in-house or external agencies, naturally the latter will incur huge costs and you will tied into maintainence contracts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>having a clear idea of what you want to achieve in terms of the requirements helps in deciding which solution will fit the bill, however in the real world this is never the case! </p>
<p>choosing open source can give you free access to the code base (or for a very small fee) before you start coding &#8211; this can help in making a decision for the long term future of the application.</p>
<p>then there is the case of hiring developers in-house or external agencies, naturally the latter will incur huge costs and you will tied into maintainence contracts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://interwovenblog.com/2008/11/19/open-source-is-free-like-a-free-puppy-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 17:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interwovenblog.com/?p=450#comment-82</guid>
		<description>
Annie, the whole &quot;open source isn&#039;t free!&quot; argument is old. Very, very old. It&#039;s already been hashed out to death by sysadmins versus IT management, as those sysadmins were busily deploying Linux and FreeBSD web, mail and database servers.

As was pointed out then, when the open source crowd says &quot;free&quot;, they aren&#039;t talking about the price. They&#039;re talking about the liberty open source gives you. You don&#039;t like the way something works? Change it. Need to extend/enhance the product? No problem, you have the blueprints in front of you. If you aren&#039;t technical enough to read them, that&#039;s OK too - there are hundreds or possibly thousands of other people that can and are willing to do the work for you.

The problem with closed-source solutions is that unless there is an extensive, well-maintained and well-documented API, you are immediately tied to the vendor for any and all support. If you&#039;ve got a great vendor, then it&#039;s not so bad ... but if not, you can be in for a world of hurt.

Just ask sysadmins who have switched from proprietary to open platforms - they&#039;ve already been down this road and most of them are pretty happy with their &quot;free&quot; solutions.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Annie, the whole &#8220;open source isn&#8217;t free!&#8221; argument is old. Very, very old. It&#8217;s already been hashed out to death by sysadmins versus IT management, as those sysadmins were busily deploying Linux and FreeBSD web, mail and database servers.</p>
<p>As was pointed out then, when the open source crowd says &#8220;free&#8221;, they aren&#8217;t talking about the price. They&#8217;re talking about the liberty open source gives you. You don&#8217;t like the way something works? Change it. Need to extend/enhance the product? No problem, you have the blueprints in front of you. If you aren&#8217;t technical enough to read them, that&#8217;s OK too &#8211; there are hundreds or possibly thousands of other people that can and are willing to do the work for you.</p>
<p>The problem with closed-source solutions is that unless there is an extensive, well-maintained and well-documented API, you are immediately tied to the vendor for any and all support. If you&#8217;ve got a great vendor, then it&#8217;s not so bad &#8230; but if not, you can be in for a world of hurt.</p>
<p>Just ask sysadmins who have switched from proprietary to open platforms &#8211; they&#8217;ve already been down this road and most of them are pretty happy with their &#8220;free&#8221; solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Bremer - 3B Web Design, London</title>
		<link>http://interwovenblog.com/2008/11/19/open-source-is-free-like-a-free-puppy-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Bremer - 3B Web Design, London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interwovenblog.com/?p=450#comment-77</guid>
		<description>I customise OS solutions for my clients - they love that they are so tweakable, and they only have to pay for my company&#039;s time to adjust, design and populate them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I customise OS solutions for my clients &#8211; they love that they are so tweakable, and they only have to pay for my company&#8217;s time to adjust, design and populate them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arash</title>
		<link>http://interwovenblog.com/2008/11/19/open-source-is-free-like-a-free-puppy-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>arash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interwovenblog.com/?p=450#comment-73</guid>
		<description>M$ is used to say such a things a few years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M$ is used to say such a things a few years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CopyCat</title>
		<link>http://interwovenblog.com/2008/11/19/open-source-is-free-like-a-free-puppy-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>CopyCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interwovenblog.com/?p=450#comment-72</guid>
		<description>LeeHunter on Dries Buytaert&#039;s blog wrote:

&quot;As a dog owner myself, I&#039;m partial to the puppy analogy. But if someone is going to use it, they should remember that the expensive &quot;purebred&quot; will have a greater chance of genetic problems caused by excessive inbreeding whereas the mutt with genetic material from all over the place, is probably going to be more robust, more even tempered, with a longer lifespan and fewer trips to the vet.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LeeHunter on Dries Buytaert&#8217;s blog wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;As a dog owner myself, I&#8217;m partial to the puppy analogy. But if someone is going to use it, they should remember that the expensive &#8220;purebred&#8221; will have a greater chance of genetic problems caused by excessive inbreeding whereas the mutt with genetic material from all over the place, is probably going to be more robust, more even tempered, with a longer lifespan and fewer trips to the vet.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Horrocks</title>
		<link>http://interwovenblog.com/2008/11/19/open-source-is-free-like-a-free-puppy-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Horrocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interwovenblog.com/?p=450#comment-68</guid>
		<description>The point of open source is free as in speech, not free as in beer.  Like when the &quot;proven, out-of-the-box solution&quot; lacks a feature you need or has a bug that breaks things... and there&#039;s nothing the user can do about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point of open source is free as in speech, not free as in beer.  Like when the &#8220;proven, out-of-the-box solution&#8221; lacks a feature you need or has a bug that breaks things&#8230; and there&#8217;s nothing the user can do about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernesto</title>
		<link>http://interwovenblog.com/2008/11/19/open-source-is-free-like-a-free-puppy-is-free/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interwovenblog.com/?p=450#comment-66</guid>
		<description>&quot;...online strategies that have multiple initiatives (intranet, extranet, portal, landing pages, micro-sites, etc.), the hidden fees lie in the heavy customization, maintenance and engineering work.&quot;

Annie, you&#039;re realize these very same costs of implementation also exist in the proprietary software systems that aren&#039;t Open Source.
 
A better analogy is Open Source is like a puppy you get out of the pound, while proprietary systems are puppies you get out a puppy mill.  

You gotta walk &#039;em, you gotta bath them, but if you&#039;re into pedigrees... you probably run Windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;online strategies that have multiple initiatives (intranet, extranet, portal, landing pages, micro-sites, etc.), the hidden fees lie in the heavy customization, maintenance and engineering work.&#8221;</p>
<p>Annie, you&#8217;re realize these very same costs of implementation also exist in the proprietary software systems that aren&#8217;t Open Source.</p>
<p>A better analogy is Open Source is like a puppy you get out of the pound, while proprietary systems are puppies you get out a puppy mill.  </p>
<p>You gotta walk &#8216;em, you gotta bath them, but if you&#8217;re into pedigrees&#8230; you probably run Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
